Discussion about this post

User's avatar
John Bloomfield's avatar

Well said Joel, but pse be careful with statements like "It cant even review taxing the multinational gas giants, allowing another ripe piece of fruit to fall from the vine..."

Such statement suggests that if the Australia govt. collected more tax from transnationals (or "the wealthy") national govt. would have more money to spend on social support for citizenry - a reafirmation of the neoliberalist mantra that tax revenues fund Fed, govt. spending - they DO NOT.

How many times have we heard the familiar refrain from neolib Fed Treasurers "we would like to have funded "x" program but couldn't because we couldn't find money for it in the budget."

That is a straight ot lie - all budget spending is a political decision - the Fed govt. never has a shortage of money, it issues the stuff by passing a money supply bill.

There could well be a shortage of necessary resources to implement such social reform, but in most cases that can be overcome by spending in ways that increase availability of needed resources to offset any inflationary effect.

The 'Federal Budget' is not a real 'budget' in the financial sense of that word - it is an outline of governance intentions. The limit of practical implementation is not the govts. available 'supply of money' - it is the ability to activate/harness available resources to achieve those set out objectives without inducing inflationary pressures.

Menzies spent on building full employment because he had no choice - he had 600,000 returned soldiers; a total of ~1 million people (~14% pop.) discharged from military service. Post WW2 civil rehabiltation was the priority - corporatism hadn't yet got it's act together to infiltrate/control govt. policy.

Menzies should be viewed in the context of those times; the Curtin/Chifley 1945 'White Paper' realisations :

"...during the war no financial or other obstacles have been allowed to prevent the need for extra production being satisfied to the limit of our resources. It is true that war-time full employment has been accompanied by efforts and sacrifices and a curtailment of individual liberties which only the supreme emergency of war could justify; but it has shown up the wastes of unemployment in pre-war years, and it has taught us valuable lessons which we can apply to the problems of peace-time, when full employment must be achieved in ways consistent with a free society.

In peace-time the responsibility of Commonwealth and State Governments is to provide the general framework of a full employment economy, within which the operations of individuals and businesses can be carried on..."

From 1942 to 1970 Aus. unemployment rate was <2% proving that full employment is possible without wars.

As per above, the unemployment rate is a political decision - whilever available resources exist to be activated/mobilised/industrialised.

We need another Gough Whitlam - a leader with vision and courage to face down the neolibs. But, alas, the lesson our politicians have taken from Whitlam's dismissal is don't get the US corporatist authoritarians/fascistic media moguls offside if you want to be re-elected.

Hence Australia's unremitting rise of US/UK aligned neoliberalism - gutless politicians refuse to confront the hegemon/s despite the obvious escalating social/ecological devastation.

Elizabeth Chandler's avatar

Thank you for this important post , and especially for your conversation with Rex Patrick . He is much missed from the Senate .

Just on another aspect of “sovereignty “, I read in a recent edition of The Saturday Paper of how the CSIRO is being defunded , and staff being reduced . Apparently , if profits cannot be clearly demonstrated , the work is of no value .

What is it about Scientific Research that this government appears not to understand ? Would they have sacked Jonas Salk

if he failed to show an immediate profit in his vital work against polio ? ? Why can this government not understand the value of research ? They thus contribute to the lowering of expertise within this country. To their perpetual shame .

( And don’t start me on their refusal to cancel AUKUS !! 😡)

7 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?