Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Adrian Jackson, OAM's avatar

There is a key difference between Labor and LNP. When Labor loses a federal election, they indulge in some soul-searching. As in searching through what is in their individual and collective souls, to identify the issues and values that matter most to them.

When the LNP lose an election, they do a bit of soul-searching. As in 'do we have one?'

And having come up empty-handed, they listen to intellectual gnats like Paul Murray and Peta Credlin, and lurch even further right, by choosing Voldo as their leader.

Expand full comment
Adrian Jackson, OAM's avatar

Past history will show that the Libs are as capable as Labor of floundering in Opposition. Remember the years of Peacock vs Howard, with Downer providing comedy relief?

I wouldn't accuse the Libs of spending much time on policy development. Any policies they intend to implement are lifted from the IPA playbook, and usually hidden from view as far as possible. Howard's demise over Work Choices reinforced the folly (from their point of view) of sharing their intentions with the electors.

They have enjoyed quick returns to office by being unrelentingly critical of Labor - often, dishonestly so, with the help of media allies.

But Morrison did such a thorough job of trashing the brand, and exposing the myth of superior management, no amount of media help will lift Dutton into The Lodge.

Add what I believe should be a raft of ex-LNP ministers facing charges arising from NACC hearings, they should be seen as unelectable for at least a decade.

Of course, extended periods of one-party rule aren't healthy. If Labor goes off the rails eventually, I suspect Australia won't turn to LNP, but oblige Labor to govern in a coalition or minority government, with Greens and teals and other indies holding the balance of power.

Expand full comment
9 more comments...

No posts